Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life

Identifieur interne : 007D80 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 007D79; suivant : 007D81

‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life

Auteurs : Damian Chalmers

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:AF365EB8F9075AB64AF80E29124521D2BCED2DC8

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority marks a new stage in European Union governance. It has no direct regulatory powers, but is entrusted with developing norms of food safety, which are to inform the material content of EC food law. The hope is that its independence and expertise will restore popular confidence both in the EU and in the food we eat. The irreducible nature of lay‐expert conflicts about hazard suggests that a more likely scenario is that such disputes become recast as opposition to EC law. Such conflict is most likely to manifest itself in national courts through challenges to or non‐compliance with EC law. The current principles for resolution of such conflicts are hopelessly outmoded. The article, therefore, argues for a constitutional resettlement, which sets out principles germane to the nature of the EC regime, namely that of a multi‐level regulatory State. It argues for a new defence of regulatory balance. Individuals could argue for the disapplication of EC norms where these violated a valued local regime which had given consideration to the issues raised in the EC legislation and whose positive value to its subjects exceeded its negative impact on the interests protected by the EC legislation.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.6604003


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chalmers, Damian" sort="Chalmers, Damian" uniqKey="Chalmers D" first="Damian" last="Chalmers">Damian Chalmers</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AF365EB8F9075AB64AF80E29124521D2BCED2DC8</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-2230.6604003</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AF365EB8F9075AB64AF80E29124521D2BCED2DC8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005745</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005745</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005745</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0026-7961:2003:Chalmers D:food:for:thought</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008013</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">007D80</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">007D80</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chalmers, Damian" sort="Chalmers, Damian" uniqKey="Chalmers D" first="Damian" last="Chalmers">Damian Chalmers</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">The Modern Law Review</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">MODERN LAW REVIEW</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0026-7961</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2230</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="532">532</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="562">562</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">31</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-07">2003-07</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0026-7961</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0026-7961</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animal feed</term>
<term>Animal health</term>
<term>Animal nutrition</term>
<term>Architectonic principles</term>
<term>Article case commission</term>
<term>Article ibid</term>
<term>Article note</term>
<term>Authority opinion</term>
<term>Balancing</term>
<term>Balancing criteria</term>
<term>Beuc position paper</term>
<term>British beef</term>
<term>British food standards agency</term>
<term>British government</term>
<term>British press</term>
<term>Broader community</term>
<term>Broader patterns</term>
<term>Broader questions</term>
<term>Case bellon</term>
<term>Case commission</term>
<term>Case hahn</term>
<term>Certain circumstances</term>
<term>Certain traditions</term>
<term>Civic society</term>
<term>Collective dispute resolution</term>
<term>Collective identities</term>
<term>Collective identity</term>
<term>Commercial interests</term>
<term>Commission proposal</term>
<term>Commissioner byrne</term>
<term>Constitutional principles</term>
<term>Constitutional revisiting</term>
<term>Consumer health</term>
<term>Consumer organisations</term>
<term>Consumer protection</term>
<term>Consumer representatives</term>
<term>Cultural traditions</term>
<term>Current regime</term>
<term>Deeper principles</term>
<term>Defence</term>
<term>Different perceptions</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Directive</term>
<term>Drink industries</term>
<term>Economic impact</term>
<term>Efsa</term>
<term>Efsa opinion</term>
<term>European aviation safety agency</term>
<term>European court</term>
<term>European food</term>
<term>European food authority</term>
<term>European food safety authority</term>
<term>European governance</term>
<term>European network</term>
<term>European parliament</term>
<term>European politics</term>
<term>European risks</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>Feta cheese</term>
<term>Financial times</term>
<term>Food authority</term>
<term>Food chain</term>
<term>Food industry</term>
<term>Food policy</term>
<term>Food safety</term>
<term>Food safety agency</term>
<term>Food scares</term>
<term>Formal justice</term>
<term>Formal powers</term>
<term>General principles</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>Human condition</term>
<term>Human health</term>
<term>Human values</term>
<term>Ibid</term>
<term>Industrial farming</term>
<term>Information security agency</term>
<term>Institutional</term>
<term>Institutional actor</term>
<term>Institutional actors</term>
<term>Institutional credibility</term>
<term>Institutional position</term>
<term>Institutional reform</term>
<term>Institutional settlement</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>Judicial process</term>
<term>Judicial reasoning</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>Legal framework</term>
<term>Legal norms</term>
<term>Legal reasoning</term>
<term>Legal regime</term>
<term>Local identity</term>
<term>Local interest</term>
<term>Local measure</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Management board</term>
<term>Market economics</term>
<term>Market transaction</term>
<term>Material content</term>
<term>Medina ortega report</term>
<term>Member state</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Michel callon</term>
<term>National authorities</term>
<term>National authority</term>
<term>National court</term>
<term>National courts</term>
<term>National food authorities</term>
<term>National governments</term>
<term>National identity</term>
<term>National institutions</term>
<term>National judge</term>
<term>National judges</term>
<term>National legislators</term>
<term>Norm</term>
<term>Normative agency</term>
<term>Offer opinions</term>
<term>Organic food</term>
<term>Other areas</term>
<term>Other values</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Particular food</term>
<term>Particular group</term>
<term>Particular interpretation</term>
<term>Particular product</term>
<term>Policy options</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Popular understandings</term>
<term>Precautionary principle</term>
<term>Press release</term>
<term>Preventive measure</term>
<term>Private dispute</term>
<term>Private parties</term>
<term>Progressive rationality</term>
<term>Public debate</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public health concerns</term>
<term>Rationality</term>
<term>Regulation</term>
<term>Regulation states</term>
<term>Regulatory balance</term>
<term>Regulatory regime</term>
<term>Regulatory state</term>
<term>Risk analysis</term>
<term>Risk assessment</term>
<term>Risk communication</term>
<term>Risk management</term>
<term>Risk society</term>
<term>Romano prodi</term>
<term>Safety agency</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Scenario</term>
<term>Secondary legislation</term>
<term>Social interaction</term>
<term>Social relations</term>
<term>Soft cheese</term>
<term>Spanish presidency</term>
<term>Such circumstances</term>
<term>Surface language</term>
<term>Technical assistance</term>
<term>Technical knowledge</term>
<term>Temporary committee</term>
<term>Tort claim</term>
<term>Traditional ways</term>
<term>Value pluralism</term>
<term>Whilst</term>
<term>White paper</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animal feed</term>
<term>Animal health</term>
<term>Animal nutrition</term>
<term>Architectonic principles</term>
<term>Article case commission</term>
<term>Article ibid</term>
<term>Article note</term>
<term>Authority opinion</term>
<term>Balancing</term>
<term>Balancing criteria</term>
<term>Beuc position paper</term>
<term>British beef</term>
<term>British food standards agency</term>
<term>British government</term>
<term>British press</term>
<term>Broader community</term>
<term>Broader patterns</term>
<term>Broader questions</term>
<term>Case bellon</term>
<term>Case commission</term>
<term>Case hahn</term>
<term>Certain circumstances</term>
<term>Certain traditions</term>
<term>Civic society</term>
<term>Collective dispute resolution</term>
<term>Collective identities</term>
<term>Collective identity</term>
<term>Commercial interests</term>
<term>Commission proposal</term>
<term>Commissioner byrne</term>
<term>Constitutional principles</term>
<term>Constitutional revisiting</term>
<term>Consumer health</term>
<term>Consumer organisations</term>
<term>Consumer protection</term>
<term>Consumer representatives</term>
<term>Cultural traditions</term>
<term>Current regime</term>
<term>Deeper principles</term>
<term>Defence</term>
<term>Different perceptions</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Directive</term>
<term>Drink industries</term>
<term>Economic impact</term>
<term>Efsa</term>
<term>Efsa opinion</term>
<term>European aviation safety agency</term>
<term>European court</term>
<term>European food</term>
<term>European food authority</term>
<term>European food safety authority</term>
<term>European governance</term>
<term>European network</term>
<term>European parliament</term>
<term>European politics</term>
<term>European risks</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>Feta cheese</term>
<term>Financial times</term>
<term>Food authority</term>
<term>Food chain</term>
<term>Food industry</term>
<term>Food policy</term>
<term>Food safety</term>
<term>Food safety agency</term>
<term>Food scares</term>
<term>Formal justice</term>
<term>Formal powers</term>
<term>General principles</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>Human condition</term>
<term>Human health</term>
<term>Human values</term>
<term>Ibid</term>
<term>Industrial farming</term>
<term>Information security agency</term>
<term>Institutional</term>
<term>Institutional actor</term>
<term>Institutional actors</term>
<term>Institutional credibility</term>
<term>Institutional position</term>
<term>Institutional reform</term>
<term>Institutional settlement</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>Judicial process</term>
<term>Judicial reasoning</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>Legal framework</term>
<term>Legal norms</term>
<term>Legal reasoning</term>
<term>Legal regime</term>
<term>Local identity</term>
<term>Local interest</term>
<term>Local measure</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Management board</term>
<term>Market economics</term>
<term>Market transaction</term>
<term>Material content</term>
<term>Medina ortega report</term>
<term>Member state</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Michel callon</term>
<term>National authorities</term>
<term>National authority</term>
<term>National court</term>
<term>National courts</term>
<term>National food authorities</term>
<term>National governments</term>
<term>National identity</term>
<term>National institutions</term>
<term>National judge</term>
<term>National judges</term>
<term>National legislators</term>
<term>Norm</term>
<term>Normative agency</term>
<term>Offer opinions</term>
<term>Organic food</term>
<term>Other areas</term>
<term>Other values</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Particular food</term>
<term>Particular group</term>
<term>Particular interpretation</term>
<term>Particular product</term>
<term>Policy options</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Popular understandings</term>
<term>Precautionary principle</term>
<term>Press release</term>
<term>Preventive measure</term>
<term>Private dispute</term>
<term>Private parties</term>
<term>Progressive rationality</term>
<term>Public debate</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public health concerns</term>
<term>Rationality</term>
<term>Regulation</term>
<term>Regulation states</term>
<term>Regulatory balance</term>
<term>Regulatory regime</term>
<term>Regulatory state</term>
<term>Risk analysis</term>
<term>Risk assessment</term>
<term>Risk communication</term>
<term>Risk management</term>
<term>Risk society</term>
<term>Romano prodi</term>
<term>Safety agency</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Scenario</term>
<term>Secondary legislation</term>
<term>Social interaction</term>
<term>Social relations</term>
<term>Soft cheese</term>
<term>Spanish presidency</term>
<term>Such circumstances</term>
<term>Surface language</term>
<term>Technical assistance</term>
<term>Technical knowledge</term>
<term>Temporary committee</term>
<term>Tort claim</term>
<term>Traditional ways</term>
<term>Value pluralism</term>
<term>Whilst</term>
<term>White paper</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Santé animale</term>
<term>Alimentation animale</term>
<term>Protection du consommateur</term>
<term>Directive</term>
<term>Industrie alimentaire</term>
<term>Politique alimentaire</term>
<term>Sécurité alimentaire</term>
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Réforme institutionnelle</term>
<term>Identité nationale</term>
<term>Science politique</term>
<term>Principe de précaution</term>
<term>Communiqué de presse</term>
<term>Santé publique</term>
<term>Règlement</term>
<term>Droit dérivé</term>
<term>Fromage à pâte molle</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The European Food Safety Authority marks a new stage in European Union governance. It has no direct regulatory powers, but is entrusted with developing norms of food safety, which are to inform the material content of EC food law. The hope is that its independence and expertise will restore popular confidence both in the EU and in the food we eat. The irreducible nature of lay‐expert conflicts about hazard suggests that a more likely scenario is that such disputes become recast as opposition to EC law. Such conflict is most likely to manifest itself in national courts through challenges to or non‐compliance with EC law. The current principles for resolution of such conflicts are hopelessly outmoded. The article, therefore, argues for a constitutional resettlement, which sets out principles germane to the nature of the EC regime, namely that of a multi‐level regulatory State. It argues for a new defence of regulatory balance. Individuals could argue for the disapplication of EC norms where these violated a valued local regime which had given consideration to the issues raised in the EC legislation and whose positive value to its subjects exceeded its negative impact on the interests protected by the EC legislation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Chalmers, Damian" sort="Chalmers, Damian" uniqKey="Chalmers D" first="Damian" last="Chalmers">Damian Chalmers</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007D80 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 007D80 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:AF365EB8F9075AB64AF80E29124521D2BCED2DC8
   |texte=   ‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022